Sunday, November 25, 2012

"Education is Politics" By: Ira Shor

Extended Comments

I used Shannon’s blog post this week to be the center of my blog.  She chose to write an argument on education and how it is failing; it has become a chore to both students and teachers.  Shannon stated, “Shor argues that the education system in the United States is not what it should be at all.  Both students and teachers are not benefiting from our country’s educational system”.  I completely agree with this statement.  Students are not taught to be creative or ask questions; they must sit in their seat, be quiet, listen to their teachers, and write notes.  I have gone to public school all my life and this is exactly what I did in school.  It was extremely boring at times.  Most teachers hated the curriculum and loathed teaching certain topics, but they had no choice but to follow it.  Another quote Shannon stated that I liked was, “People are naturally curious”.  People love to ask questions so they can learn about different things.  As Shannon stated, how do you expect people to learn if they are not given the opportunity to ask questions.  Students are constantly being taught what they are “required” to learn instead of having the student’s best interest in mind.  I also agree with Shannon about our education system and how it needs to change.  Students are dropping out of school at an alarming rate and something needs to be done.  Going to school was a chore for me as well.  It was the same routine five days a week.  Wake up at 6 a.m., go to school, fill out worksheets, take notes, and leave at 2:35 p.m.  It was not fun at all; I only enjoyed the social aspect of school.  I had several classed and teachers that I loved, but other than that and getting a good education, seeing my friends was the only thing I looked forward to.  Like Shannon, I barely learned anything.  There are a few things I remember, but a lot went in one ear and out the other.  I would study for one test and after that we began learning new material; I would forget everything I previously learned to study for the next test.  Then I would have to cram all of the material I learned throughout the year to pass my exams.  Shannon is correct, “if the curriculum was different, we would have learned so much more and we would not have wasted twelve years of our childhood sitting in a classroom day after day”.  We were only taught to obey and follow directions during school.  This method does not help students remember anything they learn.  Students need to maintain everything they learn, but the only way this can happen is if teachers make class more interesting and fun and allow their students to ask questions.  I guarantee this will help students stay engaged in school and it will decrease the dropout rate.
I found an article that relates to Shor's "Education is Politics".  It states, The Failure of American Public Education.  I also found a YouTube video: Stupid in America. Are unions destroying America's educational system?  Take a look at both!  They agree that the United States educational system needs a drastic change.

This YouTube video is different than what Shor states, it blames unions for destroying America's education system. Whereas, Shor blames teachers for following the standard curriculum. They do not make learning fun and they do not let their students state their opinions or ask questions. 
Question:
Do you agree with Shor?  Does America’s public education system need to change?

Sunday, November 18, 2012

"Citizenship in School: Reconceptualizing Down Syndrome" By Kliewer

Hyperlinks

In this article, Vvgotsky states that children who have special needs should be allowed to participate in a normal classroom setting, I completely agree with him.  There are many stories discussed throughout this article that show us some of the challenges special needs children face every single day of their lives.  One story that caught my eye was Anne, a girl with Down syndrome, and her dream of becoming a Hollywood director. She was left out of her high school transition conference and they decided that Anne would become a preschool aide.  Anne did not like the idea because she was not fond of young children.  I am glad that Shayne did something to help Anne out.  “Shayne realized this desire grew out of Anne’s love of movies and so took it upon herself to find a video rental store that would hire Anne” (78).  No one believed in Anne because she was “different”.  She proved everyone wrong and ended up doing a great job.  It makes me sick that there are companies who will not work with or hire the disabled because they feel that these people will not be able to handle the job, like Anne.  I found an article online that discusses Disability Discrimination and the Law.  Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990.  “ADA’s purpose is to prevent discrimination against people with disabilities in the workforce-- as well as in most businesses and other places open to the public-- by requiring that ‘reasonable accommodations’ be made for many types of disability”.  ADA applies to employers who are fifteen or older for a minimum of at last twenty weeks.  I am glad Congress passed this law because it is unlawful for companies to discriminate against people with special needs.  Many of them could be qualified for a job, but because they have a disability they are not wanted.  Now, the ADA helps these people get a job.  Please take a look at this article, I found it to be insightful. 

During my junior year of high school, I took culinary arts as my elective.  We were split up into four different groups when we cooked.  There were two special needs kids in my classroom and there was always a teacher with them, she helped them with everything.  They were placed in my group and at first I admit I was skeptical, I was afraid something could go horribly wrong.  But as the semester went on I realized that these children were capable of doing anything.  They were just like me; they just needed a little extra help.  I also bowl with a Down syndrome man every Saturday at East Providence Lanes.  He is twenty-one years old and he is the sweetest man you could ever meet.  He gets so excited when he gets a strike or a spare.  He always gives me a high five and I do the same to him.  I have trouble understanding him sometimes, but I always encourage him to do his best.  People with special needs are no different than you or me, they are capable of anything, it might just take them longer to accomplish something than it would for someone who does not have a disability.  Special needs students should be allowed in regular schools and classes because it helps other students accept them and it makes the special needs students feel like they belong.
Here is another article I found on Teaching Special Needs Students In the Regular Classroom.  This article states that all special-needs students are capable of success and they need to be given a great deal of encouragement.  Another article, Do children with special needs belong in mainstream classrooms?  I believe they do because they are just like regular students, they are going to school to get a good education.   
Question:
Do you believe children with disabilities or special needs belong in regular classrooms? Why or why not?
Down Syndrome: Should you send your child to a mainstream or special needs school?

Friday, November 16, 2012

Pictures from Promising Practices

I took many pictures at the Promising Practices Conference. I did not want to make my last post any longer than what it already is.  So, here are my pictures. Enjoy! :)



Thursday, November 15, 2012

Promising Practices

On Saturday, November 3rd, I attended the Promising Practices Conference.  To be honest, I was not thrilled about going.  As the day went on I ended up having a great time and I learned a lot more than I thought I would.  Dr. Dana Fusco gave her Keynote Address to the audience, which was primarily about youth development.  Youth development is maturation (biological) and learning (behavioral).  Youth and child programs can provide a healthy ecology for thriving and so can classrooms.  Another thing I learned during her speech was that sometimes school is not enough.  Children need to have relationships, hands on activities, and culminating events that celebrate accomplishments.  After school activities are great for children.  These programs help students to unwind after school; the children benefit from this because they form relationships with their peers and teachers.  There needs to be SPARK, theory of flow and engagement.  Teachers can celebrate the student’s accomplishments.  By doing this, the students will know that their teachers care about their academics and want them to succeed.  It also makes the children happy because they feel good about themselves.  Everyone wants to hear a little encouragement now and then, it is extremely important in youth development.  I found the correlation between youth development and equity interesting.  This had to do with the yin-yang visual.  One half represents youth development, “things that matter to children personally”, while the other half represents equity, “things that matter to me in the world.”  Agency divides them, but also brings them together.  Youth agency means supporting young people to be active in their own lives, but also active in the world.  Students are highly engaged when a professor “invokes dialog to get a solution.”

Workshop #1

 Once the keynote speech had finished, we were sent to our two workshops.  The first workshop that I attended was called, “Student Voice in School and Community Transformation.”  This workshop was taught by Emily Harris and several other Rhode Island College students.  Once they introduced themselves, they wanted everyone else in the room to do the same.  They asked to say our name, where we live, why we were there, and what our favorite childhood memory was.  Most of the people attending the workshop were RIC students and we all admitted that our professor’s told us to attend the conference.  I learned that this workshop pushes for improved discipline policies and stronger academic standards.  They also work together with other school groups to improve the school: the College Crusade, SMILE, and the Student Council.  I learned that we can make recommendations in our school or community.  In order for change to occur, people need to speak their mind and fight for what they believe in.  We need to focus on “planting the seeds of change.”  The class was then split into two groups and both groups were given this question.  Identify a change in your school or community you would like see?  My group and I decided that schools should not use standardized tests (NECAP) as a graduation requirement for the following reasons:
·         Every student learns differently
·         More hands on
·         Teacher focus on success
·         Testimonies (talk with students…still successful and passionate about whatever they do)
·         Focus groups
·         Focus on academic achievement
·         Go to Mayor or governor for help
- Board of Trusties, Superintendent, or Board of Education
- Students and parents
- Rhode Island Ready Program
·         College readiness
·         Do not let one test make the kid
·         If the kid is ready or not
·         Go to groups for help
This workshop taught me that I can make a difference in my school or community.  Anyone can “plant the seeds of change.”  However, not a lot people do it because they often believe that they do not have a voice and that no one will listen or take them seriously.  This is not true at all, we can all make a difference in the world; it just takes hard work, determination, and dedication.  I am glad I attended this workshop, it was helpful and fun.  Here is a website that shows one how to start a community action project.
Workshop #2
The second workshop that I attended was called, “Preventing Transgender Bullying Before Children Are 6 Or 7 Or 8 By Using Transgender Friendly Picture Books.”  Elizabeth Rowell taught this workshop.  She was extremely nice, sweet, and energetic.  She taught this workshop with such passion and was able to keep our attention the entire time.  In this workshop, I learned that over 50% of transsexuals will have a least one suicide attempt before their twentieth birthdays, some as young as 7.  This is why we have a Transgender Day of Remembrance, in honor people who took their lives because they were being bullied.  She gave us an example of a four year old boy who was thrown off the playground equipment because he was playing with a Barbie doll, the other children called him a girl.  These children are called names, made fun of, ignored, excluded, do not want to attend school because they feel unsafe, and they have been bullied at least once during school.  We discussed the “T” in LGBT because it is the one that is always left out.  The “T” stands for transgendered.  We were taught that we can stop the bullying and the only way to do that is to work with young children through anti-bias and anti-bullying activities!  The reason, transgender bullying starts then.  Children must learn to STICK UP for those who are being treated unkindly, unfairly or need some help.  One of the biggest myths/mistakes is that people think children are too young to think about these issues.  They are not too young at all, this is happening all over the world.  Another interesting fact that I learned was that most transgender adults always knew prior to six years old that they were in the wrong body.  The National Center for Transgender Equality estimates that approximately 1% of the population is transgender.  Each gender variant child is different.  However, most have strong and persistent interest in things deemed unusual for their gender such as: clothing, toys, play, and artwork.  This is why transgender children like the color people because it is a mixture of blue and pink.  Books are extremely powerful and validating for transgendered children.  When children are exposed to books like these it helps them learn about themselves and other people.  I was completely astonished when Elizabeth Rowell told us that most transgender books are soft cover.  It is rare to see a transgender book with a hard cover, but there are a few out there.  While reading these books to children, one would want the class to engage in discussions, empathy/building enhancement, role play, and act out the problems in the stories.  There would be three roles: the bully or bullies, the victim, and the bystanders.  This is the best way for kids to learn how bullying affects people.  Kids want to help other children who are being bullied, but they do not want to be bullied as well.  Here are several transgender books that the professor discussed during the workshop: “Are You a Boy or Girl”, “Be Who You Are”, “When Kathy is Keith”, “Tulip”, “Luna”, “All I Want to be is Me”, etc.  If you are interested in reading any of these books, you can go to the Rhode Island College library.  I absolutely loved this workshop and it is all thanks to Elizabeth Rowell, she did an amazing job.  This was by far my favorite workshop of the day.  I found two articles online that relate to this workshop: Research Shows Lack of Support for Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Youth in U.S. School Systems and a story about how a transgender student overcame depression and bullyingThey are sad, but interesting to read, I highly recommend that you to read them both!

After the two workshops, we went back to the Donovan Dining Center, had our lunch, and the “Unconference”.  Dr. Bogad and her A.L.L.I.E.D. group gave their presentation during the “Unconference” on Youth Development.  They discussed Cultural Competency, which is the ability to recognize and work comfortably with cultural and identity markers outside of your own.  Each student that presented had an experience that they shared that was based on cultural competency.  I am glad they shared their thoughts because it is something that people do not see as important until it is addressed.  I especially loved hearing the poem, “For the white person who wants to be my friend”, by Pat Parker.  The members each read one line from the poem and I found it to be a great way to end their presentation.  You cannot judge people based on their race or social class.  We all deserve to be valued as our own person.  Everyone is different and it does not mean that all white people or all African American people are the same or do the same things.  People look at me and automatically assume that I am white, but I am also Portuguese and Hispanic.  No one would guess that I am Hispanic or Portuguese because I do not fit the stereotype.  We need to stop automatically labeling each other; instead everyone should be open minded.  Overall, I had a terrific time at Promising Practices and I intend on going again next year. I am looking forward to it!
Connections
  1. Workshop #2 connects with the article, “Cinderella Ate My Daughter” by Peggy Orenstein.  I believe that they both connect because in the article Orenstein explains that girls are meant to play with girly items such as makeup and wear pink all the time.  While boys are meant to play with trucks and tools in order for them to be masculine.  “If you make a pink baseball bat, parents will buy one for their daughter,” she explained.  Then, if they subsequently have a son, they’ll have to buy a second bat in a different color.  I wonder what all that pinkness—the color, the dominance of the play pattern it signals—is teaching girls about who they are, what they should value, what it means to be female?” (Orenstein 43).
  2. Workshop #2 also connects with GLSEN.  Although, in the workshop we discussed the “T” (transgender) because it is often excluded.  They both talk about ways to help elementary educators to help students feel safe and school.  Both agree that we need to start with young children through anti-bias and anti-bullying activities.  They want to focus on name-calling, bullying, and bias.  It is easier to teach this to young children instead of high school students because it is harder to build respect.  Bullying needs to come to an end.  I learned a few statistics in my second workshop about transgender children and how they bullied at a young age.  Take a look at this article that I found on the GLSEN website,Playgrounds and Prejudice:Elementary School Climate in the United States.”  This article has more statistics in it.
  3. At the end of the conference, Dr. Bogad and her A.L.L.I.E.D. group discussed cultural competency.  I believe this relates to Tim Wise and his book, “Between Barack and a Hard Place”.  Wise says that we do recognize race in the world, but he argues that just because we have an African American president, does not mean that racism is over.  Racism still exists today, in all parts of the world.  Dr. Bogad and her A.L.L.I.E.D. group are saying that we cannot judge people based on race or social class.  We cannot assume that racism is over because that would mean we are ignorant to the world.  People should be more open minded instead of just assuming.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Literacy with an Attitude By: Patrick J. Finn

Reflection

While reading Finn’s article, I was able to relate it to my elementary school experience.  Anyon would have identified me as a middle-class student who went to a middle-class school.  While in school, I was constantly told to figure out the correct answer.  I had to show my work and explain how I got my answer.  I could not just come up with some answer, the teachers wanted to make sure I understood how to solve the problems.  “Middle-class school was ‘more conceptual’.  It was a matter of gaining information and understanding from socially approved sources.  Work was getting the right answer.  Answers were words, sentences, numbers, facts, and dates.  You could not make them up.  They were found in books or by listening to the teacher” (13).  I was taught how to complete tasks by following directions.  To get good grades I had to take notes from the teacher and read books pertaining to the lesson.  This was the only way for the students to get the answers right on a test.  “If you got enough right answers, you got a good grade” (13).  As Anyon stated in the article, creativity was not priority in my elementary school.  Of course we were allowed to be creative, but it was mostly just for our own entertainment.  My former teachers would sometimes compliment us on our creativity, but we were never graded on it.  “Lessons that explicitly called for creativity and self-expression were ‘enrichment’ and ‘for fun’.  They did not count toward grades” (14).  
Growing up, my parents told me my school work came first.  After school, I would go straight home and sit down at the kitchen table.  I was not allowed to do anything until my homework was complete.  As I grew older, my father refused to let me use the internet for any of my school projects.  Instead, I had to use encyclopedias and if I could not find what I was looking for only then I was allowed to use the computer.  My parents wanted me to succeed and to try my best.  My teachers and my family taught me that anything is possible, as long as I set my mind to it.  I guess that is what it all comes down to, possibility.  “The dominant theme in the middle-class school was possibility.  There was widespread anxiety about tests and grades but there was a pervasive belief that hard work would pay off” (14).  Anything is possibly as long as you are willing to work hard to achieve it.  Getting good grades has always been important to me because I have always known it would lead to college and a successful career.  Growing up, I felt like I could have been a little more challenged in school instead of given the easy A.  By no means am I complaining, but I am certainly capable of learning more than most of my former classmates.

Here is a website that relates to Finn's article.  Check it out!
Questions:
How would you relate this to your own elementary school experience? Did you come from a working-class school, a middle-class school, an affluent professional school, etc.?

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

"Between Barack and a Hard Place" By: Tim Wise

Connections

Brown v. Board of Education
For more information on Brown v. Board of Education go to this websiteThis is where I got some of my information from.

In the early 1950’s racial segregation in public schools was normal in America.  All schools in one district were supposed to be equal; most black schools were inferior to their white counterparts.  Whites and African Americans were considered separate, but equal.  Brown v. Board of Education was a Supreme Court case in Topeka, Kansas where Linda Brown’s parents sued an all-white school because they refused to enroll her because she was an African American.  On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court discussed this controversial debate.  They stated, "We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities?”.  Their ruling, “We believe that it does...We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment”.  The Supreme Court ruled that “separate but equal” was against the Fourteenth Amendment.  They made it illegal to segregate students by color.  However, the Supreme Court’s decision did not abolish segregation in other public areas such as restaurants and restrooms.  This was a giant step towards desegregation of public schools.  U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education marked a turning point in the history of race relation in the United States.

Today, most people believe that racial equality has been accomplished.  Especially since the United States elected our nation’s first African American president (President Barack Obama) in November 2008.  Tim Wise, author of “Between Barack and a Hard Place”, explains that this is not true.  Here are some quotes by Wise that I took from the video.
“Evidence of racism and discrimination against average every day folks of color is still very much inevitable”.
“We are still in a position and this election proves it.  There is no way in the world that a person of color could have been taken seriously as a presidential candidate if they graduated 5th from the bottom of the academy they attended”.
“The proof of racial equity will be the day that people of color can be as mediocre as white folks”.
He states, most white people still believe that African Americans are not as smart as white people.  African Americans need to work incredibly hard in order to be recognized.  In order for people to vote for Barack Obama, he needed to show the people of America how intellectual he is in order to be taken seriously.  If he did not prove this then most of Americans would have considered him a joke in the 2008 presidential election.

Wise and Johnson
These two authors have similar ideas, which is, "Instead of talking about the racism and sexism that plague people's lives, people talk about 'diversity' and 'tolerance' and 'appreciating difference'.  Those are good things to talk about, but they're not the same as the ism and the through they're connected to" (Johnson 12).  People cannot ignore racism, it is a painful memory that still occurs in our society.  They both agree that the first step is to recognize what the problem is and involve others in this predicament in order to make a difference.

Wise and Delpit 
"Those with power are frequently least aware of- or least willing to acknowledge- its existence.  Those with less power are often most aware of its existence" (Delpit 26).  These authors are stating that people who are privileged and are not affected do not see any problems.  But there are others who see just how horrible discrimination is because they are witnessed to it every day.  One cannot simply state that racism does not exist because it does.  People say this because they are not aware of what is truly going on in the world, they just assume.  People must talk to one another in order to see if discrimination is still happening.  To get an answer talk to the families who live in lower class neighborhoods and see what they witness every day.  Only then you will find the real answer.

Bob Herbert and McIntosh
Bob Herbert's article, "Separate and Unequal" and McIntosh both agree that white people have white privilege.  It is something most whites are unaware of.  "White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, code books, visas, clothes, tools, and black checks" (McIntosh 1).  White children seem to be given a better education than Hispanic and African American children.  In Brown v. Board of Education they declared that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" (Herbert).  We did not intend for so many Hispanic and African American children to be put into these poor schools.  Just because a school is poor does not mean the education should be different, but in reality this is true.  Upper class schools give better educations to their students than lower class schools because they have the money to do so.  "Educators know that is is very difficult to get consistently good results in schools characterized by high concentrations of poverty" (Herbert).  The best teachers avoid these schools because expectations of the students are not the same and parental involvement is too low.  These teachers are wearing the white privileged knapsack.  How are these children going to get a good education if people are not willing to teach them and see what these young children are capable of.  "If you really want to improve the education of poor children, you have to get them away from learning environments that are smothered by poverty" (Herbert).  We can do this by sending these under privileged kids to upper class schools or send "the best teachers" to these lower class schools so these children can receive the education they truly deserve.

Questions:
Do you believe racism still exists today?  Have you heard or witnessed any racists comments that were directed towards yourself or someone else?

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Miscellaneous Post on "Gay Marriage"

I was going through my news feed on Facebook when I came across a picture on the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, Straight Alliance page. The picture indicated below, "I Support Gay Marriage.  It's About Love Not Gender", was the first photo that I saw on my Facebook page and it made me decide to go searching for more photographs.  These photos reminded me of the readings that we had discussed in class.  There are many texts that these photos can relate too.  For instance, in Johnson's article, Privilege, Power, and Difference, it describes that, "People can't help fearing the unfamiliar.  There is only one natural sexual orientation (heterosexual)"(3).  It also relates to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).  If you look at my previous blog post you can see that this article talks about putting a stop to name-calling, bullying, and bias.  It focuses on all students who have different gender identities.  Lastly, these pictures also refer to the presidential election between President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.  My last blog post was about abortion, but I added a link at the end of my post about gay marriage and how Romney and Obama differ on this issue.  President Obama and I believe that gay marriage should be supported in the United States.  Also, today at the Promising Practices conference, I was in a workshop about Preventing Transgender Bullying.  I just thought it was interesting that I now often notice these different gender identity issues and can relate them to most of our class topics and discussions. By looking at these pictures and my blog posts you can tell where I stand on gay marriage.  It hurts me that there are people who do not understand that marriage is just about love and not gender.  Hopefully, people can try to change their perspective about this issue.  Everyone is equal and has a right to be happy. Honestly, same-sex marriage is not hurting anyone so what is the problem?

If you have a Facebook I recommend looking for the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, Straight Alliance page.  They have amazing pictures.  Take a look!!! :)

While watching the news, I discovered that France is thinking about legalizing same-sex marriage. Here is a website that explains it all.  I found it very interesting.  Hopefully, the bill for gay marriage becomes ratified in France. :)

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Obama vs. Romney: Abortion

An article that states how Obama and Romney feel about abortion and my reflection

The topic that I have chosen to discuss is abortion.  This article states Romney's and Obama's position on the issue of abortion.  This is one of the controversial issues that are occurring in the United States today. Governor Mitt Romney is pro-life and President Barrack Obama is pro-choice.  President Obama believes that women should have the right to choose what happens with their bodies including the choice whether to be pregnant or not.  Now, Romney used to believe that women could decide whether or not they wanted an abortion.  He has since changed his view; he opposes abortions, “unless it involves cases of rape, incest or if the mother’s life is in mortal danger”.  They both support adoption and believe that children should grow up in safe and stable environments.

I seem to be caught in the middle about this subject.  As a woman, I agree with Obama, women should have a choice.  However, I believe the father of the child should also have an input.  I am against abortion and believe that if individuals want to engage in sex then that is fine, but they should prepare for the consequences.  There is only one way to insure that a woman does not get pregnant, abstinence.  Like Romney, I agree if a woman is raped and becomes pregnant she has the right to get an abortion.  But at the same time, I still do not believe that women should get an abortion.  These children can be put up for adoption.  I seem to be leaning more towards pro-choice.  There is a famous quote written by Mother Teresa that states why she believes there has not been a cure for cancer.  She stated, “I once asked God that question, and He told me that He had sent a doctor into the world to discover the cure to cancer.  However, the doctor was aborted as a baby”.  I have heard of this quote before, but discovered it on Catholic Answers ForumsIt seems to be a reasonable explanation from a Catholics perspective.     

Another controversial issue that they differ on is gay marriage.  I found an article online that states "4 ways they differ on gay issues"Take a look it is very interesting.

Questions:
Where do you stand on these issues?  Are you pro-life or pro-choice?

Sunday, October 21, 2012

"In the Service of What?" By Kahne and Westheimer

Quotes

1) “Educators and legislators alike maintain that service learning can improve the community and invigorate the classroom, providing rich educational experiences for students at all levels of schooling.  Service learning makes students active participants in service learning projects that aim to respond to the needs of the community while furthering the academic goals of the students” (2).

Service learning does not just help the volunteer; it is also important to the person or group of people you are helping.  The service learning project that we are completing in class helps us learn how to become teachers and get a look at what we will be working with someday.  I work in an ESL classroom where most of the students speak Spanish.  You leave an impact while working with your students.  I enjoy returning to my classroom every week just to see the children and have them say “Hello Miss Pires!”.  Service learning is beneficial for everyone who is involved.

2) “Boyer endeavored to create ‘a new Carnegie unit,’ the requirement that all students take part in volunteer activities in either their school or community as a condition for graduation from high school” (5).

I agree with Boyer, I believe every high school should have a service learning requirement.  High schools should have a minimum of twenty hours for their service learning/community service requirement.  Kids today are egocentric, they only care about themselves.  A service learning requirement would help students become aware of the contributions they could come up with just to help people in need.  One could volunteer at a hospital, a nursing home, a soup kitchen, or an animal rescue center.  No matter the place, the feeling is always the same.  Emotions will become involved and you will become attached.  You can create happy memories just knowing that you can help someone in need. 

3) “A music director at a middle school we studied wanted her suburban, upper-middle class students to perform at a nearby elementary school in a poor neighborhood.  Some of the middle school parents objected, saying they were concerned for their child’s safety.  In a written evaluation, the students said that they had imagined ‘horrifying children running around on a dirty campus’”(7-8).

I find this to be very typical amongst the upper class.  They believe that because the school is in a poor and bad neighborhood that those students are delinquents and that they behave like animals.  Sadly, I was one of them before I began my placement.  I told my family what school I had been assigned to for my service learning and they told me it was not a great neighborhood and they were not too thrilled with my placement.  The students and I both learned that what we originally thought was just the complete opposite.  These are normal schools with regular children who are just trying to learn.  Our perspectives on schools in rough neighborhoods has changed.  Just like the old saying goes, “Never judge a book by its cover”.  How can dislike something or have a very strong opinion about it if you never experienced it yourself?
Delpit has stated that change is change and that it helps no matter what the cause.  Kahne and Westheimer believe that change is not enough.  Instead, we need to construct a plan of action and begin social reconstruction in order to actually solve problems in this world.

Here is a link that explains what service learning is and why it is important. Hope you enjoy!

Question:
Should service learning be a requirement in all high schools?

Monday, October 15, 2012

Cinderella Ate My Daughter: By Peggy Orenstein

Extended Comments

I chose Kaela’s blog to be the center of my blog post.  I agree with all of her thoughts and opinions about this article.  Kaela stated “The author of Cinderella Ate My Daughter argues that gender specific toys like Barbie’s, American Dolls, Princesses, and domestic type toy teach young girls and boys the wrong views of the world”.   This is true; there are not many toys out in the retail industry that are not sexist or biased.  As Kaela stated and I agree with her, “These are fairytales we have and we can’t change it”.  Our society has accepted that “pink” is a girl’s color, girls can only dress like princesses, and boys are the only ones who should play with tools or cars.  If boys are not playing with masculine toys or items then they are torn of their masculinity and seen as feminine.  Another important statement Kaela makes is, “We shouldn’t take the imagination and fantasies away from children.  Watching and playing with these toys are okay as long as other options are available to your children”. 
I was obsessed with Disney movies as a child and I knew every song and most of the lines.  Sadly, that still holds true to this day.  As a child I hated Barbie dolls, I wanted no part of it.  I also disliked the color pink, blue has always been my favorite color and my old bedroom was painted that color.  Children see nothing of it because they do not see it in an adult’s point of view.  My cousin, who happens to be a guy, wanted a Barbie doll when he was a child and his parents said no, but they eventually they caved in.  I believe parents do not want to give their child certain toys because it will affect their sexuality.  If a child wants to dress up as a princess for Halloween or a teenage mutant ninja turtle, then let them regardless if they are a boy or girl.  I personally do not see a problem with it.  Honestly, what harm is going to come from it?  Kids have wild and vivid imaginations and they have different tastes.  We need to let children explore the world, including themselves to see what they truly adore and love.
I believe this article relates to Linda Christensen's article "Unlearning the Myths That Bind Us".  The media, toys, and society have a huge impact on children's lives.  "Our society's culture industry colonizes their minds and teaches them how to act, live, and dream" (126).  Boys should play with cars and girls should have pink items and wear makeup.  It teaches them how they should act in society. 
Here is a link that states: Are pink toys turning girls into passive princesses? 

I am not sure if anyone is familiar with the show “Toddlers and Tiaras”, but I found an interesting article online about The Five Biggest Controversies to Hit“Toddlers and Tiaras”.  I agree with what the article states as well.  
 
Comments/Questions:
How do you feel about the use of sexism through the toy industry?  Would you buy a child a toy that is not "ideal" for them based on their sexuality?  Were you allowed to watch Disney movies as a kid, why or why not?

Sunday, October 7, 2012

"Unlearning the Myths That Bind Us" By Linda Christensen

Quotes

“My waist didn’t dip into an hourglass; in fact, according to the novels I read my think ankles doomed me to be cast as the peasant woman reaping hay while the heroine swept by with her handsome man in hot pursuit” (126).
In almost all cartoons and Disney movies, this quote is true.  Girls have to be skinny and have a tiny waist in order to be viewed as “beautiful”.  All of the Disney princesses have perfect bodies including their facial features.  It seems to me that Disney is saying the only way a girl can be considered beautiful is if she looks like a Barbie doll.  Disney is sending horrible examples to our children.  This is why so many young girls are going on crazy diets in order to be deemed as beautiful by our society.  They are teaching children that beauty is based on physical appearances and facial features.  Instead, the message to children should be that beauty is skin deep and that everyone is beautiful in their own way.
“Happiness means getting a man, and transformation from wretched conditions can be achieved through consumption” (133).
I usually hear girls say that they are looking for their prince charming and sadly I am one of them.  In order to achieve happiness and get a man, girls must wear new clothes and have a nice hairstyle.  Without beauty, it seems as if a girl will never get a guy to fall for her.  A woman does not need to buy expensive clothing in order for a man to like her.  But let’s face the facts, a woman does not need a man to make her happy.  Every princess gets married at the end of every Disney movie.  By saying “I do”, it makes young girls realize that marrying a man will help them achieve their “happily ever after”.  The only way for anyone to achieve their dreams is to work hard and persevere. 
“Our society’s culture industry colonizes their minds and teaches them how to act” (126).
            Young children are being affected by society, the media, and television.  Children are taught to dream a fairytale lifestyle and how someday they will come true along with our Prince Charming that will swoop us away to a “happily ever after”.  Our society is sexist and racist because of the cartoons and movies we watch.  Since childhood we were taught how to judge other people.  I watch cartoons and I see mindless nonsense that seems innocent enough to me, but when you take a closer look there examples of sexism and racism.
            Comments/Questions:

I love Disney movies not because of the fairytale endings or the “happily ever after”, I enjoy them because it makes me feel like a kid again.  It sickens me to realize that Disney is one of the major contributors to racism and subliminal messages.  They also make us stereotype other minority groups, like the Indians in Peter Pan.  I was oblivious to these as a kid, but when I watched cartoons I did realize a few things.  I never saw many females in older cartoons.  But the one thing that I always questioned was, why won’t the people who created Tom and Jerry let me see the African American woman’s face?  I never understood it until now.  As children, we are all taught the rules and codes of power as Delpit has described in "The Silenced Dialogue" and we do not realize that we know them until it is too late.                                                   
Here is another quote that I really enjoyed, “My dreams keep me from dealing with an unpleasant reality” (129). I feel as if everybody dreams so we can attempt to achieve those dreams.  I know many of the things I dream seem nearly impossible to accomplish.  Dreams help us to achieve success in life and inspire everyone with passion.  We are in fact in an unpleasant reality and no one likes to admit that, so the best way to cope is to dream.  It certainly helps if I do say so myself.  Do your dreams keep you from dealing with an unpleasant reality? If so, how or why? 
Here is a link I found that states why Disney princesses are bad role models:
Here are two YouTube videos.  The first is Disney racism and the second is Jenna Marbles and her opinion/rant on Disney princesses.

  

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

"Aria" #2

Again, I already revised my first Aria post and added a link to it. Here is the link I posted, check it out!

http://www.sharingsuccess.org/code/bv/bebv.html

Peggy McIntosh's "White Privilege" #2

I already revised the first Peggy McIntosh post on "White Privilege" and added this link to it. But this is just a reminder :)                                                                   

http://scarletmoth.xanga.com/753846154/white-privilege-stop-denying-you-have-it/

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). By Andy Marra

Reflection
The toolkit I chose was Ready, Set, Respect!  It was designed for elementary teachers to make every student feel safe, secure, and respected while in school.  Ready, Set, Respect is designed to focus on name-calling, bullying, and bias. GLSEN is an excellent resource for students who are being bullied.  What I like most about this site is that it does not just focus on straight students; it includes students with different gender identities as well (gay and lesbian).  I never had a program in school that taught me how to deal with different gender identities.  I had to ask my parents questions or figure it out for myself.  I believe this is a great tool to help students learn at a young age that there are many different gender identities.  Although, people may seem different because of their gender identity, they are not.  Everyone is equal and deserves to be treated with respect.

Though GLSEN has many useful articles, the one article I found interesting was Playgrounds and Prejudice: Elementary School Climate in the United States.  It states in the article “school climate and victimization can affect students’ educational outcomes and person development at every grade level”.  Elementary school students are the first to hear homophobic remarks by their peers.  This article found numerous key findings on biased language and bullying, non-conforming students, family diversity, and teacher preparedness.  There were my favorite key findings that I found remarkable.
·         “The most common forms of biased language in elementary schools, heard regularly by both students and teachers, are the use of the word “gay” in a negative way, such as “that’s so gay,” (students: 45%, teachers: 49%).  Many also report regularly hearing students make homophobic remarks, such as “fag” or “lesbo” (students: 26%, teachers: 26%) and negative comments about race/ethnicity (students: 26%, teachers 21%)”.

·         “75% of students report that students at their school are called names, made fun of or bullied at least some regularity.  Most commonly this is because of students’ looks or body size (67%), followed by not being good at sports (37%), how well they do at schoolwork (26%), not conforming to traditional gender norms/roles (23%) or because other people think they’re gay (21%)”.

·         “Only a third of teachers report having personally engaged in efforts to create a safe and supportive classroom environment for gender nonconforming students”.

·     Seven in ten students say they have been taught that there are many different kinds of families.  However, less than 2 in 1 have learned about families with gay or lesbian parents".
 
·         A majority of elementary school teachers believe they are obligated to ensure a safe learning environment for gender nonconforming students (83%) and students with LGBT parents (70%).  Eight in 10 teachers would feel comfortable addressing name-calling, bullying or harassment of students because a student is perceived to be gay, lesbian or bisexual (81%) or is gender nonconforming (81%)”.
I can relate to the second key finding because I remember going to elementary school and students were always bullying other students.  It followed up until high school and continued 24/7.  We never had a program like GLSEN to ensure that every student would feel safe in school.  Being bullied as a kid, I know how the pain feels emotionally and it is not a feeling a child should have.  I believe this is an excellent program that should be set up in every single school district around the world.  I encourage everyone to take a look at the GLSEN website and take a look at some of their articles.  What you see may surprise you.

Comments/Questions: Do you believe we should have programs in schools that help prevent bullying, name-calling, and bias?